Friday, March 17, 2006

Alpine Type R Swr 1242d

useful for a Christian mortification Does it make sense?

For those who are horrified by Christian mortification

Each year with the arrival of Lent, Catholics devote time to intensify prayer and penance are revived criticism, ridicule or misunderstanding, to the Christian practices of mortification, sometimes leading to scandal : there are those who are outraged that surprised even the modern secular world there are those who become distressed.

Problems of understanding
be no longer feels strange rejection of postmodern culture by mortification of others. At bottom, it seems enclose a good dose of hypocrisy.

If you look, from a purely worldly point of view, it's something free that also benefits the practitioner. In effect
· involve the exercise of personal freedom: nobody is forced to do so, but willingly made
· is done for spiritual reasons: lifting and personal improvement
· not hurt anyone: on the contrary, many mortifications favor to others (one is denying itself the benefit of others).
· no damage their own health: indeed, many mortifications contribute to its improvement.
· is in private practice, need not bother, no one is proud of his mortification, neither the sample nor the public does, but tries to be as unobtrusive as possible as a matter of humility, following the Master's teaching: "When you fast, do not be sad finjáis like the hypocrites, for they disfigure their faces to see how fast people. Truly, I say they have received their reward. You, however, when thou fastest anoint your head and wash your face, to warn men not to fast, but thy Father which is in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly " (Mt 6.16 to 18). So

looked really should move to admiration and praise of others.
On the contrary, it is striking that in a culture that says all options tolerant personal mortification such rejection occurs, should come between good tolerability.
This scandal is at least contradictory. It occurs in a world that "blessing" for example, euthanasia, what could be considered the worst of mortification (obviously not, since it is an act of generosity, where one is offered by others) . And paradoxically, there was no one who frowns one who is sick of living (or have) the killing itself and the company to help you do this, is horrified because one person decides to suffer a little for altruistic reasons.

Sacrifice is part of the life of any person. Changing motivations and concrete practices. In fact, the culture that worships the body has its "mortification" secularized:
· piercing, body piercing and carry all types of metal hanging in various parts of the body, tongue, eyebrow, waist, breasts, etc..
· tattoos: marked the body as was formerly the slaves with inscriptions that last a lifetime gastric
· belts from eating more than the account
· Costs cosmetic surgery to raise the profile of the face
• the sporting competition requires sacrifices athletes dietary and training very hard.
· Diet exhausting to look overly skinny body that require women to present the aesthetic, and that often lead to psychiatric disorders such as anorexia or bulimia
· hours grueling gym to get a muscle "drawn" and flat tummy.
· Exhibition solar heat for hours to suffer often unbearable to wear a tan, which theoretically improves the image itself (this only whites do, ironically the people of other races trying to bleach the color of their skin)
· confinement for hours on bowling no light, no air with smoke, deafening music, at times that require hours of patient waiting ...

Could it be that it is not understood and not to offend the self-mortification, but why is it done?
In fact, what is not understood in Christian mortification is why: not done to earn money or to acquire fame, or glory, or power, or for professional or sporting success, or to have a more attractive body or for selfish reasons. Every sacrifice made by earthly motives are praised. But if they say they are spiritual motivation, things change. Puzzled ... and up unworthy.

And that same world of strict dieting seems like a horror fasting: a person to stop eating voluntarily for love of God sounds like an act obscurantist, retrograde, masochistic and overcome ... And it bothers him that there are people who practice it. In the practice of corporal mortification, or talk.

And those who are scandalized by the celibacy (there who are not married by the Kingdom of Heaven seems an affront to humanity) are the same as they do not want to marry and not be tied to anyone (why marry wonder if you can enjoy a woman / man without compromise and without children, and change to when you want, without further ado?)

Surprise some of our contemporaries to the mortification is more curious still taking into account that is not new: the Christians have mortified continuously for 2000 years of Christianity. This is not a recent invention of some Christians, but a practice two millennia of them all. Without going any further, Lent (the time of preparation for Easter which is characterized by the practice of intense mortification) comes from the very earliest centuries, has already in the second century Christians were fasting in preparation for the feast of Resurrection.

This inability to understand the cultural mortification is a limitation. It will pass, is a consequence of the prevailing fashions.
hedonistic culture is an anthropological failure, which does great harm to man. Just look at their fruits: depression, loneliness, hatred of babies, marriages decline, plague of divorces, abortions, promiscuity, glorification of pornography and prostitution, AIDS, massacres of embryos, human experimentation, attempts to "production "human beings for the supply of organs for sick people ...
Hedonism does great harm to man. It will pass, like all fashions. It is a pity the many people who destroy their lives (the only one!) Dazzled the culture of death, a life project as harmful to themselves. It takes patience because we know that after a generation comes another ... and fashions come and go.

Christians understand that those with a pose materialistic life can not understand the mortification and many other things. Even Jesus, when rebuked Peter for trying to convince him that the cross was crazy, said, "You are thinking not of God but of men" (Mt 16:23). That way is not understood. And Paul says, "the natural man can not understand the things of the spirit of God are foolishness to him" (1 Cor 3, 14). It happens that those who is saturated with materialism, think and judge all things according to these coordinates alone: \u200b\u200baccording to the old adage, as quoted by St. Paul himself: "Let us eat and drink for tomorrow we die" (1 Cor 15:32).

Why Christians beat themselves?
Mortification of the essence of Christianity: there is no Christianity without the cross. Thus recorded in the Scriptures and Christians lived so from the beginning.

Moreover, it was also true in the Old Testament. Indeed God sends prophets to preach repentance. Just think of Jonah and his preaching in Nineveh: "Within forty days and Nineveh shall be overthrown "(Jonah 3.4). And as penance for their inhabitants moved divine mercy (Jonah 3.10).

And the messianic era, opening with John the Baptist, that "curiously" lives in the desert, feeds rudimentary way penitently dresses, etc. (Mt 3.4). And not coincidentally, is part of the divine plan. His preaching is just "do penance, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand" (Mt 3.3).
And the same Messiah begins his public life, with forty days of fasting in the wilderness (Mt 4.2). Invited to carry the cross. Announces the persecution of his disciples (Lk 21.12). Sleeping outdoors in his travels (he has nowhere to lay his head: Mt 8.20). States that no one has greater love than to give his life for his friends (Jn 15:13). The same is delivered to death to save us: please note that all the sufferings endured by Christ in the Passion should be considered volunteers, not only as offering something happened against his will and can not be avoided, "why I love the Father, because I give my life to it again. No one takes it from me I give voluntarily. I have power to lay it down and power up again. " As he explains to his disciples that it was necessary that this happen (Luke 24.25-26): there was no other way.

is so necessary it is even a basic condition for being a Christian. Jesus himself points out when invited to follow: "Whoever wants to follow me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me" (Mt 16:24). And the disciples, who had a hard time accepting it at first, eventually understood: shortly after Pentecost when they were hit by the Sanhedrin, leave happy to have been considered worthy to suffer for Christ (Acts 5:41) and his letters are full of optimistic and joyful references to the cross. One example among many, in San Pablo: "Now I rejoice in my sufferings for you, and in my flesh what is lacking in the afflictions of Christ for His Body which is the Church "(Col 1.24).

So very early Christians adopted the cross-the instrument where his God was tortured and killed, as the Christian sign of excellence. Not out of masochism, but out of pity: it is the ultimate manifestation of God's love.
And while no one looks to be, the Christian martyrs are heroes: it is considered a grace of martyrdom.
And we prepare for the biggest party (the Resurrection of Christ) with a long period of penance forty days of Lent, which commemorates the forty days of fasting of Jesus in the desert (in which, besides prayer, sacrifice and charity personal-we are commanded to do two days of fasting). And every Friday of the year are days of penance, in which through abstinence we join the redemptive passion [1] .

And God forgives our sins in the sacrament of penance, where the divine mercy we "apply" the merits of the Passion and Death of Christ. And the purification of the "consequences" of sin is done personally by joining the cross of Jesus through repentance in its two dimensions: the main-inner change of heart, and its external manifestation-mortification-(Catechism of Church n. 1431).

In the Christian doctrine eternal salvation passes through the cross. Hence the Saviour redeemed us, and there must also pass the disciples. Santa Rosa de Lima said it in a graphical way, "without the cross there is no other ladder by which up to heaven."

Mortification has two "versions". The "passive" is generous and joyful acceptance of sorrow, pain and suffering that come unsought. The "active" are what we seek its own initiative (on forms of penance, cf. Catechism of the Church, nos. 1434-1439).

A clarification. Christians are not crazy. Nobody thinks that we feel pleasure in the pain-it hurts as anyone, but obviously with the time one gets used. Nor do we think it is a "price" we pay for our salvation.
We are moved by love. As the first commandment to love God (Mt 22.37-40), and ultimately the only, as all the other-target that could not be otherwise: we mortify by love as an expression of love and to enable us to love better.
And although it is very necessary, mortification is far from being the main Christian practice. Is a function of inner purification, and the same is not an end in itself: we purify ourselves to be more pleasing to God and prepare to be more docile the action of the Holy Spirit.
Mortification has meaning and value only in a context of love for God. Who is mortified by other reasons, for pride or vanity, to feel pure, superior, or whatever-will lose all credit for his action, which would be rendered meaningless.

And the truth is that no big deal ... We are not martyrs, and we are heroes, not victims. We believe it is the least we can do for those who have suffered so much for us.

mortification benefits
The main benefits are spiritual mortification.
been so good for the soul! Purified themselves sins and their consequences, "spiritualized" by increasing the sensitivity to the sentence, given dominion over self, away from the temptations, free from fads, immunization against consumerism and frivolity, is a school of generosity. Leads to overcome shortcomings and grow in virtue.
And the best mortification is to help us improve our character and give to others, has many consequences in human terms. It helps us work better (punctuality and order, for example, are great mortification). A better life and living charity (endure patiently inappropriate jokes, listen to heavy people, etc.. Are all examples of mortification). It even helps more enjoy the finer things in life (lack of self-denial leads to things "cloy"), in the same way as when we were kids, we liked the candy, the more we enjoyed the less eat them.

Mortification not embitter life, and diminishes us encouragement, but ends up being a source of joy. So they lived

saints and millions of Christians "common" look at the cross God's blessing.

To understand the meaning of Christian mortification is highly recommended, for example, reading the texts of the Liturgy of Lent: the prayers and readings for the Masses each of those forty days. You can find there a wealth of doctrine.

And if we remember that God only asks us what we need, we find that, paradoxically, the mortification is key to achieving happiness

Fr. Dr. Eduardo Maria Volpacchio


03/15/1906 [1] In Argentina, the Episcopal Conference authorizes the withdrawal of meat replacement by abstinence from alcohol, or a charity or by a practice of piety .

Tuesday, March 14, 2006

Super Sniper Vs Bushnell 3200

Do I fast before receiving Communion?

How many minutes is an hour?
The third requirement is it really necessary?

To receive the Holy Eucharist requires three conditions: 1) be in the grace of God, 2) know who is going to receive communion with devotion approaching, 3) and save a one hour fast before receiving Communion. We will deal with the latter to consider whether it is really important.

What does the law of the Church

The Catechism of the Catholic Church states in the number 1387 the third condition to commune with dignity: "To be properly prepared to receive this sacrament, the faithful should observe the fast prescribed by the Church (cf. CIC can. 919). For the disposition of the body (gestures, clothing) is manifested respect, solemnity, the joy of that moment when Christ becomes our guest. "

The Code of Canon Law contains the law of the Latin Rite Church (there is another code for Eastern Rite). The fee to which it refers to the Catechism says:

"CIC 919 # 1 Who will receive the blessed Eucharist is to abstain from all food and drink at least one hour before Holy Communion, except water and medicines. CIC
919 # 3 The elderly and sick, and those who care for them, may receive the blessed Eucharist even if they have taken something in the preceding hour. "

is not only advice, is much more. It is a legal provision "should observe the fast" and "must refrain from any food" are expressions of obligation that should not be prescribed to communicate without meeting this condition.

"passé?

Some think the need for a one hour fast before receiving Communion "does not run anymore." They say "that was then, as if it was not applicable in the Church. They see it as something from the time of our grandmothers ...
Just wanted to remind you that the Code of Canon Law we are talking about is not the old 1917, but suspended in 1983. And Catechism of the Church published in 1992. And they're both in force in the Church. The last document that speaks of the Eucharistic fast is the IL of the Synod on the Eucharist (October 2005). That is, the precept is now beyond doubt.

"Exemptions?

merely ecclesiastical law, human law does not oblige the Church when there is distress. In this issue, it seems easy to imagine a case, outside the health situation in the canon expressly provided above.

A frequent question

is not uncommon to hear this question: "How many minutes is the time of fasting before communion?" Or, "If I got five minutes, how I can communicate?"
First, the obvious: in principle the hours are 60 minutes.

addition, the text of the law, it says briefly an hour, as if we could begin to begrudge a few minutes, but "at least an hour before," ie, that aims to be more than an hour. It does not require an hour, but said a lower limit.
not forget that until the time of Pius XII ruled fasting since the previous day. For this there was no evening Mass time. In the 50's of last century, the Pope reduced fasting three hours, and after Vatican II, he spent about an hour.

Sense of fasting

The Church is not intended to limit the Communion, which are less faithful who receive communion, but to ensure respect and veneration of this great sacrament we receive Christ himself.

In the Working Document of the Eleventh Synod on the Eucharist (October 2005) states that "It has been expressed a desire to restore everywhere the Eucharistic fast that rigorous attention is still in use in the Eastern churches. Indeed, fasting, and self-control, requires the concurrence of the will and leads to purify the mind and heart. St. Athanasius says, "Want to know what are the effects of fasting? ... cast out demons and rids of bad thoughts, enlivens the mind and purifies the heart. " In the Lenten liturgy frequently is invited to the purification of the heart through fasting and silence, as recommended by St. Basil. In a response to Lineamenta questions about the opportunity to reconsider the requirement of three hours of Eucharistic fast. "

Will I lose communion for five minutes?

Yes, because nobody forced you to eat.
nobody actually forbids communion. Just as you have not prepared enough: you are missing a few minutes of preparation and respect for the Eucharist not want to be rude to the Lord. Namely the love of the Eucharist which takes you to not take communion.

Communion and obedience

Today not a few people violate this precept of the church hide behind that communicating is very important.
Yes it is, but more important is obedience.
I tell you the case of King Saul. God instructs that after defeating the Amalekites destroy everything in this town. After the victory, God sends Samuel to rebuke him not having fulfilled its mandate. The conversation, if not tragic, be fun. Samuel asks why you have not done what God commanded? Saul begins to answer that perfectly fulfilled ... Samuel cut it with an irony: So what is this lowing of cattle, the bleating of sheep, etc., I hear? To which the king attempts to justify, saying they saved the best of livestock to be sacrificed in honor of God. Apparently, a laudable project. Answer God through Samuel: "Worth the victims obedience." In fact, for this disobedience God rejected Saul as king, and chose David to replace him. Disobedience that apparently had a good excuse, with an apparent disobedience good intentions: "I prefer obedience to sacrifice."

is best not to take communion in obedience to the Church Communion
disobeying

is impossible to be pleasing to God who communicate disobeying.
Sure, without a doubt, it is more pleasing to God not receive communion if you lack the time of fasting as an expression of respect and obedience, that communicate on a whim, but against the law of the Bride of Christ, do you chords of "whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven"?

Conclusion: it has more merit before God (ie, is more valuable) the act of obedience of allowing Communion to obey the Church, which disobeying communion (if this had any merit and not a lack ...).

Can dispense?

Some faithful claim that the priest, authorizing them to receive Communion without due time of fasting. We say that does not apply, because the priest has no authority to waive a church law: you can not, and if so, the permit would be null (as if I give you permission to marry underage, I have no this power, if given permission, would be false, invalid, null).

pastoral and practical grounds
addition

for legal reasons, moral and deserving of Communion without fasting is not appropriate, there is also a practical reason: he who fails to communicate that "did not give him time," calculated better next time and be prepared with more finesse to Communion . Will not happen again, as it will be more attentive.
communicants without due time it will become increasingly lax in their calculation ... and will be stretching the time ... And live in the "razor's edge."

The Eucharist deserves respect.

We do things good. Not to be chantas to do good.
Some might think "not care" "How are you going to do a little minutes problem?", "Do not be exaggerated."
No, it does not matter. Is respect. It is delicate. Shows how much you value the Sacrament.
Communion is not anything. Is the greatest thing we can do in this life.
The liturgy makes the priest pray before receiving Communion in the Mass a sentence with a singular request, that the Communion "is not for me to trial and condemnation." Asks for something, and who asks it is the priest and asks for himself.

If not communicate one day reach the required minimum fasting an hour, nothing happens. Not a sin, not a lack of respect, not a lack interest. Communion is not required and, therefore, is not needed to do so. If you have so eager to communicate, offer God can not do it, make a spiritual communion. And I turned to what is sent to guard the dignity of this sacrament.

is absurd to commit a sin by communion without the proper dispositions, without any need to do

Let me repeat: fail to communicate is not a sin. Disobeying church law is. Obey the law of the Church is meritorious. Committing a sin trying to do something good is utterly ridiculous.


P. Eduardo Volpacchio
capellania@colegioelbuenayre.edu.ar 10/28/2005